Measured, not claimed
How fast is Himali Green?
We benchmark this site against the most-visited ecommerce sites in Nepal and publish everything — the method, the machine, and the results we lose.
No run published yet. The benchmark measures this site over the public internet, exactly as it measures everyone else’s, so the first results land shortly after this page goes live — and every number here will be written by that measurement rather than typed in by hand.
Check it yourself
You do not have to trust our tooling, and you should not have to. Every page in this comparison is a public URL — ours included — measured with a tool that ships inside the browser you are reading this in.
- 1. Open any URL below in Chrome, then DevTools → Lighthouse.
- 2. Set Mode to Navigation, Device to Mobile, and tick only Performance.
- 3. Run it a few times and take the median — one run is noise.
We measure our own site the same way we measure everyone else’s: over the public internet, at www.himaligreen.com, with no local shortcut and no special case.
What this does not prove
The limits of the claim, stated by us rather than left for someone else to find.
- It is a snapshot. Every published figure describes the day it was measured, and that date is printed beside every claim. Every site here is under active development, and any of them could be faster than us tomorrow — which is why we re-measure and republish rather than quoting one good afternoon forever.
- It measures page speed, not the shop. Daraz has a catalogue we cannot match and a logistics network we are years from. Loading quickly is one thing a site can be good at, and it is the only thing this page is about.
- Bigger sites carry more weight for a reason. Much of what makes a large marketplace slower is functionality we simply do not have yet. The comparison is fair as a description of what a shopper experiences; it is not a judgement of anyone’s engineering.
- Lab numbers are simulated. Lighthouse models a mid-range phone on Slow 4G rather than renting one. That is what makes the run reproducible, and it is also why the field-data section exists.
Something look wrong? Tell us — if a run is mistaken we would rather fix it than defend it.